JCPenny's Musings
I'm a King James Bible believing sinner saved by the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ! I was raised by a good mother and I went to a KJV church growing up. I am a mother of 5 lovely children, 2 grandchildren, and am married to a crazy Cajun for 28 years now! I think bow ties are cool, and grey hairs are like tinsle for your head. I admire those who do right no matter the cost, and wish to avoid those who would compromise the truth.
Sometimes the devil doesn't tempt us with evil; sometimes he allures us with good, distracts us with obligations, confuses us with compromise, or hinders us with business to keep us from that which is best- service to our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ! Remember, the devil always offers his best, before Christ will offer His will for your life.
Tuesday, June 2, 2026
Monday, June 1, 2026
John Prepared Jesus
Everyone who has any Bible knowledge knows that John is the Old Testament fulfillment of the prophecy of the return of the prophet Elijah. In fact, he’s the last old testament prophet.
At first glance, it may seem so simple or even random. John was there. Jesus came. Jesus got baptized.
But when you slow down and look closer, you'll realize, this wasn’t random at all. John the Baptist wasn’t just some wild preacher who showed up in the wilderness. Luke tells us that he came from a priestly family.
This was his world as he was growing up.
So when John stood in the Jordan River, he wasn't standing there as a novice. He carries with him generations of priestly preparation.
John is both a prophet and a priest. He came not wearing priestly robes, but camel’s hair. He was not standing at the altar, but in knee-deep in water. He wasn't offering animal sacrifices, but rather calling people to repent. He’s doing priestly work, but outside the temple. And perhaps, that’s the point. Something greater than the temple is about to show up.
Priests didn’t just offer sacrifices. They check them first. The lamb had to be clean. I should contain no defects. It was to be set apart for that specific purpose and then declared acceptable.
So when John sees Jesus walking toward him and says, “Behold, the Lamb of God, whic taketh away the sin of the world," that's not just a descriptive title. That’s priestly language.
John doesn’t call Jesus a teacher. He doesn’t call Him a prophet. He calls Him the Lamb. And then, he baptized Him.
Now we have to see that this isn’t Jesus confessing sin. Jesus had none. This moment is rather about identification. Preparation. It’s like John, a priest by birth, is publicly pointing out the true sacrifice, the final one.
The same man who prepared people through the baptism of repentance now prepares the One who will truly cleanse them.
John’s baptism fits that pattern so beautifully.
When Jesus came up from the water, the heavens opened, the Spirit descended, and the Father spoke. The Lamb had been revealed. His ministry can now begin.
But what I really admire about John is that he never tries to hold onto the moment. He knows his role. “He must increase, but I must decrease.” That’s not insecurity; that’s faithfulness.
John, as the priest, prepares the way. John, as the prophet, points to the Messiah. Then John steps aside.
His greatness wasn’t in how long he preached or how many followers he had. It was in how clearly he prepared the way, and how willingly he gave the spotlight to Jesus.
John baptized Jesus.- a priest prepared the Lamb. And the Lamb willingly stepped into the water. From there, the story keeps moving, toward a hill outside Jerusalem, where water would no longer be enough, and blood would finally be poured out. And because of this sacrifice, we have a New Testament!
What John began in the Jordan River Jesus finished at the cross.
Thursday, May 21, 2026
The Mark Of The Beast
Bible prophecy was never given to create fear or confusion, but to reveal God’s order, timing, and purposes. When Scripture speaks about the Mark of the Beast, it places it within a specific prophetic period and connects it to worship, allegiance, and judgment — not to the present Church Age.
“And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:” (Revelation 13:15–16, KJV)
This sequence matters. The Mark is not vague, gradual, or hidden. It is public, enforced, and unmistakably connected to allegiance. It's almost as if the mark is the effect and the worship of the Beast is the cause; you can't have the one without the other.
THE HEART OF THE ISSUE: WORSHIP, NOT TECHNOLOGY
Scripture consistently emphasizes that God looks at who or what is worshiped. In the Tribulation, the world is divided by a single question: Who will you give your allegiance to?
“And they worshipped the dragon which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?.” (Revelation 13:4, KJV)
Receiving the Mark is not merely participation in an economic system. It is submission to the authority of the Beast and rejection of God’s truth. Technology may serve as a tool, but the act itself is spiritual allegiance.
WHY THE MARK CANNOT BE RECEIVED ACCIDENTALLY
The Bible never presents the Mark as something taken unknowingly. Revelation 14 makes the order unmistakable- they worship and receive.
“And the third angel followed them, saying with a loud voice, If any man worship the beast and his image, and receive his mark in his forehead, or in his hand, The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb: And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.” (Revelation 14:9-11 KJV)
Worship comes first. The Mark follows. The choice is made to swear allegiance to the Beast and then the mark is given. This removes fear-based claims that people today could accidentally receive the Mark through medicine, identification systems, or modern technology. Scripture does not support that idea.
THE CHURCH AND GOD’S WRATH
It is crucial to rightly divide here.
The Mark of the Beast is directly tied to God’s wrath, not merely persecution. But Scripture also clearly states:
“For God hath not appointed us to wrath, but to obtain salvation by our Lord Jesus Christ,” (1 Thessalonians 5:9, KJV)
The Church is not present for the outpouring of God's wrath described in these verses in Revelation. The word "church" doesn't even show up in the book after Revelation chapter 3! The warnings about the Mark are recorded so that God’s prophetic program is understood — not to suggest the Church will experience it.
WHY THIS MESSAGE STILL MATTERS TODAY
Although the Mark is future, the present moment is a time of grace. Prophecy points forward, but salvation is offered now. Avoiding a future judgment does not save anyone. Only the gospel does.
“Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:” (1 Corinthians 15:1–4 KJV)
Eternal life is received by believing in Jesus Christ and His finished work — not by fear, not by reform, and not by religious association.
FINAL THOUGHT
Prophecy is meant to bring clarity, not panic.
The Mark of the Beast belongs to a future time.
Grace belongs to now.
Believe the gospel while it is freely offered. If millions of people have just vanished all around the world, then you are already in the Tribulation and this devotional applies to you. If that hasn't happened yet, then you still have time!
Tuesday, May 5, 2026
Monday, May 4, 2026
The Founding Father And Deism
I found this post online, and I thought it had some really good points to it. The title of the poster is under the name Templar Mind.
You've heard it a thousand times. You may have even sat in a university lecture hall, with fluorescent lights humming overhead, while a professor in a tweed jacket dismantled your heritage.
He told you the Founding Fathers were enlightened Deists. He told you they didn’t believe in miracles, didn’t care about the divinity of Christ, and viewed the Creator as a distant “Clockmaker” who wound up the universe and then went on vacation.
You've heard that these men built a secular machine designed to keep God out of the gears. It's the favorite bedtime story of the radical left. It soothes them.
It convinces them that the United States was always intended to be a godless vacuum where the only moral authority is the state.
It's a lazy way to view history, perpetuated by men who are terrified of a God who acts. Sure, they always point to Thomas Jefferson taking a razor to the Gospels or Benjamin Franklin’s youthful indiscretions.
But they stop reading there because the rest of the story destroys their narrative. Jefferson, even while editing the Gospels, could not escape the God who governs.
He still wrote into the Declaration of Independence that men are “endowed by their Creator” with unalienable rights and closed the document with an appeal to “the protection of divine Providence.”
Franklin, who called himself a “thorough deist” in his autobiography, later admitted he found deism “not very useful” and spent his final years quoting Scripture to a room full of statesmen.
The full arc of their lives undermines the secularist case more than any cherry-picked passage. The men who forged this nation did not believe in an absentee landlord.
They believed in Providence. They believed in a God who fights, who judges, and who intervenes in the mud and blood of human history.
George Washington was not a man of many words, he was a man of action. When he took the oath of office on April 30, 1789, In his First Inaugural Address, he offered what he called his “fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the Universe, who presides in the Councils of Nations.”
He declared that “No People can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand, which conducts the Affairs of men more than the People of the United States.”
A Deist doesn't pray for help because a Deist believes no one is listening. Washington prayed constantly. He credited the survival of the Continental Army not to strategic brilliance, but to the direct action of God.
In a private letter to Brigadier General Thomas Nelson on August 20, 1778, Washington wrote: “The hand of Providence has been so conspicuous in all this, that he must be worse than an infidel that lacks faith, and more than wicked that has not gratitude enough to acknowledge his obligations.
That's from a private letter. No audience to impress. No political calculation. Washington is calling anyone who denies divine intervention in the American Revolution “worse than an infidel.”
Then you have Benjamin Franklin. The secularists love him. He is their patron saint of skepticism. Yet, look at the man in the heat of the Constitutional Convention of 1787.
The delegates were at each other’s throats. The union was crumbling before it even began. After five weeks of deadlock, tempers had fractured along the fault line of state representation.
Franklin at eighty-one, the oldest man in the room, stood up. He didn’t appeal to reason. He didn’t appeal to the Enlightenment.
He said, “I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth...that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?”
He quoted Psalm 127: “Except the Lord build the House they labour in vain that build it.” And then he moved that the Convention open each day with prayer, imploring “the assistance of Heaven.”
The motion didn't pass. Alexander Hamilton reportedly objected that calling for prayer might signal desperation. The Convention had no funds to pay clergy. But the procedural failure is irrelevant.
What matters is what Franklin actually believed and said aloud to the men who were building this nation.
This was an old man, staring at the end of his life, telling a room of ambitious politicians that they were fools if they thought they could build without God’s help.
John Adams wasn't at the Constitutional Convention. He was serving as the American Minister to Great Britain in London while the delegates debated in Philadelphia.
But he understood the document they produced better than most of the men who signed it, because he understood its fatal weakness.
Eleven years after the Convention, in October 1798, President Adams wrote to the officers of the Massachusetts Militia. He looked at the Constitution they were all sworn to defend and laid bare its vulnerability:
“Because We have no Government armed with Power capable of contending with human Passions unbridled by morality and Religion. Avarice, Ambition, Revenge or Gallantry, would break the strongest Cords of our Constitution as a Whale goes through a Net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”
Adams understood human nature. He knew that without the fear of God...a specific, terrifying, and active God. liberty turns into license, and license turns into tyranny.
The secular historian tries to tell you that “religious” just meant “generally nice.” It didn’t.
Adams was explicit that the laws of the republic were “emanations of the Divine mind,” that the moral order was grounded in the Creator.
He meant, people who understood they would answer to a Judgment Seat higher than the Supreme Court.
Washington, the general, says religion and morality are “indispensable supports” of political prosperity.
Franklin, the philosopher, says God governs in the affairs of men.
Adams, the lawyer, says the Constitution is a net that only holds moral and religious fish, everything else tears right through.
Three different men, three different temperaments, three different vocations, and the same conclusion:
without God, the experiment fails.
The Founders understood that rights do not come from the King, and they do not come from the parchment of the Constitution.
They come from the Creator. This aligns with the reality of the Imago Dei. We are made in His image, and therefore we possess a dignity that the state cannot grant and cannot take away.
The Fathers of the Church understood this long before Philadelphia.
St. John Chrysostom, in his homilies on Romans, taught that civil authority is ordained by God and that rulers are ministers of divine justice...not autonomous agents of their own will.
St. Basil the Great insisted that those who govern bear a heavier judgment precisely because their authority is borrowed from above.
The American Founders, whether they knew it or not, were working within a framework the Church had articulated for over a thousand years: that legitimate authority flows downward from God, not upward from the consent of the governed alone.
But we must check our own hearts. The “City on a Hill” is the Church, not the United States of America.
America is a beneficiary of Christian truth, but it is not the source of it. We fall into a dangerous trap if we idolize the nation. As it is written, “Put not your trust in princes, nor in the son of man, in whom there is no help” (Psalm 146:3).
If we make America an idol, we lose the very faith that made America possible. Jesus is the King of Kings, not just the President of Presidents.
We defend the heritage of this nation because it provided a cradle for the faith, but we must not confuse the cradle with the Savior.
True patriotism is the sober recognition that our freedom is a fragile gift, maintained only by the grace of God and the virtue of the people.

